Rule 25. Recusal.

 

 

 

Rule 25.1. Motions.

Rule 25.2. Affidavit.

Rule 25.3. Duty of the trial judge.

Rule 25.4. Procedure upon a motion for disqualification.

Rule 25.5. Selection of judge.

Rule 25.6. Findings and ruling.

Rule 25.7. Voluntary recusal.

 

 

Rule 25.1. Motions.

 

All motions to recuse or disqualify a judge presiding in a particular case or proceeding shall be timely filed: in writing and all evidence thereon shall be presented by accompanying affidavit(s) which shall fully assert the facts upon which the motion is founded. Filing and presentation to the judge shall be not later than five (5) days after the affiant first learned of the alleged grounds for disqualification, and not later than ten (10) days prior to the hearing or trial which is the subject of recusal or disqualification, unless good cause be shown for failure to meet such time requirements. In no event shall the motion be allowed to delay the trial or proceeding.

 

Rule 25.2. Affidavit.

 

The affidavit shall clearly state the facts and reasons for the belief that bias or prejudice exists, being definite and specific as to time, place, persons and circumstances of extra judicial conduct or statements, which demonstrate either bias in favor of any adverse party, or prejudice toward the moving party in particular, or a systematic pattern of prejudicial conduct toward persons similarly situated to the moving party, which would influence the judge and impede or prevent impartiality in that action. Allegations consisting of bare conclusions and opinions shall not be legally sufficient to support the motion or warrant further proceedings.

 

Rule 25.3. Duty of the trial judge.

 

When a judge is presented with a motion to recuse, or disqualify, accompanied by an affidavit, the judge shall temporarily cease to act upon the merits of the matter and shall immediately determine the timeliness of the motion and the legal sufficiency of the affidavit, and make a determination, assuming any of the facts alleged in the affidavit to be true, whether recusal would be warranted. If it is found that the motion is timely, the affidavit sufficient and that recusal would be authorized if some or all of the facts set forth in the affidavit are true, another judge shall be assigned to hear the motion to recuse. The allegations of the motion shall stand denied automatically, The trial judge shall not otherwise oppose the motion.

 

Rule 25.4. Procedure upon a motion for disqualification.

 

The motion shall be assigned for hearing to another judge, who shall be selected in the following manner:

 

(A) If within a single judge circuit, the district administrative judge shall select the judge;

 

(B) If within a two judge circuit, the other judge, unless disqualified, shall hear the motion;

 

(C) If within a multi judge circuit, composed of three (3) or more judges, selection shall be made by use of the circuits existing random, impartial case assignment method. If the circuit does not have random, impartial case assignment rules, then assignment shall be made as follows:

(1) The chief judge of the circuit shall select a judge within the circuit to hear the motion, unless the chief judge is the one against whom the motion is filed; or

 

(2) In the event the chief judge is the one against whom the motion is filed, the assignment shall be made by the judge of the circuit who is most senior in terms of service other than the chief judge and who is not also a judge against whom the motion is filed; or

 

(3) When the motion pertains to all active judges in the circuit, the district administrative judge shall select a judge outside the circuit to hear the motion.

 

(D) If the district administrative judge is the one against whom the motion is filed, the available judge within the district senior in time of service (or next senior in time of service, if the administrative judge is the one senior in the time of service) shall serve in this selection process instead of the district administrative judge.

(E) If all judges within a judicial administrative district are disqualified, including the administrative judge, the matter shall be referred by the disqualified administrative judge to the administrative judge of an adjacent district for the appointment of a judge who is not a member of the district to preside over the motion or case.

If the motion is sustained, the selection of another judge to hear the case shall follow the same procedure as outlined above.

 

Rule 25.5. Selection of judge.

 

In the instance of any hearing on a motion to recuse or disqualify a judge, the challenged judge shall neither select nor participate in the selection of the judge to hear the motion; if recused or disqualified, the recused or disqualified judge shall not select nor participate in the selection of the judge assigned to hear further proceedings in the involved action.

 

Rule 25.6. Findings and ruling.

 

The judge assigned may consider the motion solely upon the affidavits, but may, in the exercise of discretion, convene an evidentiary hearing. After consideration of the evidence, the judge assigned shall rule on the merits of the motion and shall make written findings and conclusions. If the motion is sustained, the selection of another judge to hear the case shall follow the same procedure as established in Rule 25.4 above. Any determination of disqualification shall not be competent evidence in any other case or proceedings.

 

Rule 25.7. Voluntary recusal.

 

If a judge, either on the motion of one of the parties or the judges own motion, voluntarily disqualifies, another judge, selected by the procedure set forth in Rule 25.4 above, shall be assigned to hear the matter involved. A voluntary recusal shall not be construed as either an admission or denial to any allegations which have been set out in the motion.